• Jason Griffing

Entity vs incremental theories of intelligence

Carol Dweck and others argue that there are two competing theories on intelligence. "Entity theorists" attribute success or failure to ingrained and unalterable traits, using language like "I am smart" or "I am dumb." "Incremental theorists", on the other hand, believe mastery can be achieved through a step-by-step process. They embrace the process of growth. They see success as a result of hard work and failure as an opportunity to learn.


Entity theorists can be very intelligent, but also tend to be far more brittle because they see failure as a reflection of their innate worth. While incremental theorists can be far more resilient, allowing them to push to the highest levels of performance because the inevitable setbacks, while still painful, are framed primarily as opportunities to learn and improve.


This idea has powerful implications for individuals, leaders, parents, and leaders alike.

Recent Posts

See All

"Limits are an artist's best friend." —Frank Lloyd Wright In his book, "A Whack on the Side of the Head", author and creativity expert Roger Von Oech reminds us that constraints can be a powerful st

In describing how he wrote the book, "Mind Wide Open", author Steven Johnson discusses a challenge we're all familiar with—deciding what ideas to focus on and which ones to ignore. He calls the method

In their book, "The Courage to be Disliked" authors Ichiro Kishimi and Fumitake Koga introduce the reader to Adlerian Psychology. This school of thought, named after its founder Alfred Adler, is less